For the teams shipping copy faster than counsel can review it.

The MiCA transitional window closes on 1 July 2026, and most formerly-registered EU crypto firms are still working toward authorisation. Marketing keeps shipping — landing pages, ads, emails, KOL briefs.

Pre-flight every asset

Run every asset before it goes live.

Brief KOLs and agencies

Check influencer creative against disclosure and risk-warning rules before it ships under your brand.

Triage a back-catalogue

Work through everything already live and rank what to fix first.

This is the output. Read it before you pay for it.

An audit we ran with the MiCA pack — not a mockup. A fictional exchange hero block we wrote ourselves, audited against all 40 MiCA rules. We never use a customer’s or a prospect’s copy as a sample.

=== MICA SUBSCRIBER AUDIT — SAMPLE-001 ===
Asset type:    Landing-page hero block (fictional exchange, written by NorthPoint)
Submitted:     2026-07-27T09:12:00Z
Jurisdictions: EU general
Pack:          MiCA marketing self-audit — 40 rules

ASSET UNDER AUDIT
  H1:     "Earn up to 12% APY on your idle crypto."
  Sub:    "Europe's best rates, with no lock-up."
  CTA:    [ Create account ]
  Footer: "Crypto-assets are highly volatile and your capital is at risk." (10px, grey)

VERDICT: 1 FAIL · 3 FLAG · 36 PASS — DO NOT SHIP

❌ Rule 10 — Substantiation for numerical claims
   Citation:        Article 88(1) + ESMA guidance on advertising of investment services
   Triggered text:  "Earn up to 12% APY on your idle crypto."
   Issue:           The headline number carries the entire offer but is undated,
                    unsourced and has no stated methodology, so a consumer cannot
                    verify it.
   Suggested rewrite: "Earn a variable rate — 12% APY on [asset] as of 27 July 2026,
                    per our published rate schedule. Rates change daily."

⚠ Rule 11 — No emphasis on potential gains without potential losses
   Citation:        Article 88(1) + ESMA guidance — balanced presentation
   Triggered text:  "Earn up to 12% APY" / footer: "...your capital is at risk."
   Issue:           The gain sits in the hero; the only loss language is a 10px
                    footer line, so the block that does the selling is unbalanced.
   Suggested action: Carry the loss into the same sentence as the gain.

⚠ Rule 6 — Risk warning prominence
   Citation:        Article 88(1) + ESMA Guidelines on Marketing Communications
   Triggered text:  "Crypto-assets are highly volatile and your capital is at risk."
   Issue:           The warning is substantive (Rule 1 passes) but sits footer-only,
                    at a weight far below the hero claim it is meant to qualify.
   Suggested action: Move it into the same viewport as the H1 and CTA, at body-copy
                    weight; drop the footer duplicate once moved.

⚠ Rule 3 — Unsubstantiated superlatives
   Citation:        Article 88(1) — fair, clear, not misleading
   Triggered text:  "Europe's best rates"
   Issue:           A comparative claim with no source, no date and no comparison set.
   Suggested action: Remove it, or replace with a dated, sourced comparison.

✓ Rules 1, 2, 4, 5, 7–9, 12–40 — passed or not applicable to this asset.

OPERATOR'S READ:
This is fixable in one pass. The highest-impact single change is moving the risk line
into the hero and attaching it to the yield claim — that addresses Rule 6 and Rule 11
together. The 12% number is the one thing that must not ship undated.

AUDIT-HISTORY ROW (JSON):
{
  "asset_id": "SAMPLE-001",
  "submitted_at": "2026-07-27T09:12:00Z",
  "asset_type": "landing_page_hero",
  "verdict": "FAIL",
  "fail_count": 1,
  "flag_count": 3,
  "pass_count": 36,
  "triggered_rules": [
    {"id": 10, "severity": "FAIL"},
    {"id": 11, "severity": "FLAG"},
    {"id": 6,  "severity": "FLAG"},
    {"id": 3,  "severity": "FLAG"}
  ]
}

WHAT YOU RECEIVE, PER ASSET

Every run returns the same six things.

A verdict line — N FAIL · M FLAG · K PASS, with a plain ship / do-not-ship call.
Per-rule analysis across the whole pack — MiCA 40 rules, GDPR 30 rules, FCA 25 rules. Every rule assessed, not only the ones that trigger.
The triggered text, quoted back.
A concrete rewrite for every FAIL and a suggested action for every FLAG — drafted copy, not “consult someone”.
An operator’s read — what to fix first.
An audit-history row (JSON) — a dated record, so you can show your work later.

What it is not: a certification, an approval, or a promise that an asset will pass a regulator’s assessment.

Subscribe to the suite, or buy a single audit.

SINGLE · €49 ONE-TIME

Single Audit

One asset. One pack. Pay once.

One asset, one jurisdiction pack — MiCA, FCA, or GDPR.
Full Pro depth — the whole pack (MiCA 40 rules, GDPR 30, FCA 25), not the 5-rule public version.
No subscription — for when you just need one thing checked properly.

Buy a single audit · €49 →

SUITE · €199/mo

Self-Audit Suite

MiCA, FCA and GDPR hosted. Unlimited assets. Monthly.

MiCA + FCA + GDPR — all three full Pro packs.
Unlimited self-audits — run as many assets as you ship.
Credit-back — 100% credited toward a NorthPoint CMO plan within 60 days.

Start the Suite · €199/mo →

Both run the same engine as our signed Launch Audit — you drive it, or we deliver the signed report. Not sure which? Talk to us first →

Prefer the same rules as files in your own tools? The packs also ship as Compliance Check Skill Packages →

Bought a skill package and lost your download link? Recover it →

Try it on one asset, free.

Free MiCA check Free FCA check Free GDPR check The 1 July MiCA deadline →

The same rule content also ships as portable markdown skills for your own tooling — see the Compliance Check Skill Packages →

The Compliance Self-Audit Suite is an operator-grade heuristic that returns information to help you identify and fix likely marketing-compliance issues. It is not legal advice and does not guarantee a regulatory outcome or that any asset will pass a regulator's assessment. For a binding view on a specific promotion, authorisation, approval or exemption, retain qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.