// EU · MICA · REGISTER CHANGE LOG · GENERAL INFORMATION

ESMA MiCA register changes.

A dated log of what actually moved on ESMA’s two MiCA registers — the register of authorised crypto-asset service providers and the register of non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services. Each entry is produced by re-fetching ESMA’s own published register files and diffing them against the previous snapshot, and reproduces the entity name, the national competent authority and the register date exactly as ESMA records them. This is general information for EU users and marketing teams, not legal advice and not a determination of any firm’s status. Naming an entity here reproduces a published regulatory listing at a point in time — it is not an allegation of wrongdoing.

Read this first. ESMA republishes these registers weekly and entries can be added, amended or removed at any time. Everything below is a point-in-time reproduction of a public register file, with the file’s own date attached. Absence from the non-compliant register is not evidence that an entity is authorised, and presence on it is a published regulatory listing concerning authorisation under MiCA — not a finding of wrongdoing. Always confirm the current entry on the ESMA register, and consult qualified counsel for your situation.
// Latest register file 23 July 2026 3 dated register movements logged below, newest first. Machine-readable: /data/register-changelog.json · /data/register-delta.json.
309

Authorised crypto-asset service providers on ESMA’s register.

Register file dated 23 July 2026
164

Entries on ESMA’s register of non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services.

Register file dated 16 July 2026
3

Dated register movements logged on this page.

Latest: 23 July 2026

What changed, by register date.

Authorised CASPs

ESMA’s register of authorised crypto-asset service providers (CASPS.csv) is dated 23 July 2026 and carries 309 authorised CASPs (+15 vs 294 in the file dated 2026-07-13).

Added to the register (15)

  • Altcoins BG EООD — Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) (BG) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-21
  • BitPay B.V. — Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) (NL) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-15
  • Bleap SIA — Latvijas Banka (LV) · authorisation notification date 2026-06-25
  • BNY SA/NV — National Bank of Belgium (NBB) (BE) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-20
  • Coinify ApS — Finanstilsynet (DK) · authorisation notification date 2026-05-29
  • Damoon Technology (Europe) AG — Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) (LI) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-10
  • Digital Assist OOD — Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) (BG) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-21
  • Januar ApS — Finanstilsynet (DK) · authorisation notification date 2026-06-29
  • JT Technologies GmbH — Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (DE) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-14
  • Nodu Digital, SIA — Latvijas Banka (LV) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-08
  • Raiffeisenbank Falkenstein-Wörth — Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (DE) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-13
  • SafeLynx Technologies ApS — Finanstilsynet (DK) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-08
  • SG Digital Assets Limited — Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) (CY) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-13
  • Spar- und Kreditbank Rheinstetten eG — Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (DE) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-27
  • VR-Bank Augsburg-Ostallgäu eG — Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (DE) · authorisation notification date 2026-07-21

Field changed (2)

  • Hodleris SIA — Latvijas Banka · authorisation notification date: not recorded → 2026-06-25
  • Kaiser Partner Privatbank AG — Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA) · authorisation notification date: 2026-06-30 → 2026-06-29

Name string changed (1)

  • “CRIPTAN TRADE, S.L.” → “CRIPTAN TRADE S.L.” — Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV)

These are the same entries under a re-spelled name in ESMA’s file — they are not entities joining or leaving the register.

Source: ESMA register of authorised crypto-asset service providers (CASPS.csv), file dated 2026-07-23; re-fetched and diffed by NorthPoint’s build against the previous committed snapshot (file dated 2026-07-13). CASPS.csv. Naming an entity reproduces a published register listing — it is not an allegation of wrongdoing by NorthPoint.

Authorised CASPs

ESMA’s register of authorised crypto-asset service providers (CASPS.csv) is dated 16 July 2026 and carries 294 authorised CASPs (+14 vs 280 in the file dated 2026-07-15).

ESMA’s register update dated 16 July 2026 added 14 authorised crypto-asset service providers, taking the register from 280 to 294. Reported additions include Ripple Payments Europe, Portugal’s Bison Bank and Croatia’s Hrvatska poštanska banka. Carried forward from the figures already published on NorthPoint’s CASP tracker; entity-level detail for this update was not machine-diffed.

Recorded at register-total level only: this update predates NorthPoint’s entity-level diff, so individual entries are not reproduced for it.

Source: ESMA register of authorised CASPs (updates dated 15 and 16 July 2026); corroborated by Cointelegraph, 17 July 2026. CASPS.csv. Naming an entity reproduces a published register listing — it is not an allegation of wrongdoing by NorthPoint.

Non-compliant entities

ESMA’s register of non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services (NCASP.csv) is dated 16 July 2026 and carries 164 entries (+2 vs 162 in the file dated 2026-07-13).

ESMA’s register update dated 16 July 2026 added two entities to the register of non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services, following action by Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB), taking the register to 164 entries. Carried forward from the figures already published on NorthPoint’s non-compliant register page.

Recorded at register-total level only: this update predates NorthPoint’s entity-level diff, so individual entries are not reproduced for it.

Source: ESMA interim MiCA register, non-compliant entities file (NCASP.csv), update dated 16 July 2026; corroborated by Cointelegraph, 17 July 2026. NCASP.csv. Naming an entity reproduces a published register listing — it is not an allegation of wrongdoing by NorthPoint.

How these figures are counted.

NorthPoint counts the authorised register as distinct (entity, competent authority) pairs: the 312 data rows in ESMA’s CASPS.csv dated 23 July 2026 resolve to 309 entities, because ESMA lists some firms on more than one row. A count of authorisation records rather than distinct entities gives a higher figure from the same file — which is why published totals differ between sources.

Every figure on this page is derived from ESMA’s published register files at the date shown — never from a third-party summary and never from an estimate. Where a register file did not move between runs, no entry is written: this log records movement, not activity.

The full registers.

  • The authorised side: which crypto exchanges are authorised, restricted or withdrawn in the EU/EEA, with the legal entity, the national competent authority, the decision date and the source per row.

  • The mirror: ESMA’s register of “non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services”, reproduced with the listing authority, the authority’s own wording, the decision date and the source per row.

  • Marketing rules, risk warnings, whitepaper parity, reverse solicitation and the July 2026 transitional deadline — sourced, with the article numbers.

Check your own marketing against these rules.

  • Run a page, ad, email or post against the MiCA, FCA and GDPR marketing rules and get the specific clauses it touches.

  • The full 40-rule MiCA, FCA financial-promotions and GDPR marketing audits, written by an ex-CMO of two international crypto exchanges.

  • A whole asset-set review across your EU markets against MiCA, FCA and GDPR. Five business days.

This page is general, educational information for EU users and marketing teams, not legal, financial, or investment advice, and not a determination of any firm’s status or any authority’s intentions. Every entry reproduces what ESMA’s public register files recorded at a point in time — the entity name, the national competent authority, the register date and the source file — and can change as licences are granted, withdrawn or restrictions lifted. Appearing on the register of non-compliant entities providing crypto-asset services is a published regulatory listing concerning authorisation under MiCA; it is not a finding of wrongdoing, and NorthPoint makes no such allegation about any entity named here. Confirm the current position on the ESMA register and with the relevant national competent authority, and consult qualified counsel for your situation. Latest register file dated 23 July 2026.